From Ron’s Facebook page:

The fact that PNC Bank and its attorney chose to proceed with the “foreclosure sale” in light of the Affidavit of Negative Averment filed with the court was shocking! What they called an “auction” was a charade. I was there. My home was sold without due process of law; in fact the court broke many laws in this saga of a lawsuit that has never gone to trial. Now, they will likely order the police to break their oath of office and uphold the criminal actions they have taken. What can we do when courts and police break the law? http://youtu.be/h3HuwopCnMo

0 thoughts on “2012: WHEN COURTS & POLICE BREAK THE LAW

  1. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=230593


    Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 16-Feb-2012 20:29:50

    Hi, Folks –

    Thanks to Reader R. for the pointers and footwork on this. :)

    Available as video:

    Blackheath’s comments start at approx. 17:20:00.

    Unofficial transcript found here:



    Lord James of Blackheath – 15 Trillion dollars and 750 thousand metric tonnes of gold

    16.02.2012 17:37 in Lord%20James%20of%20Blackheath

    Breaking news Lord James of Blackheath has spoken in the House of Lords holding evidence of three transactions of 5 Trillion each and a transaction of 750,000 metric tonnes of gold and has called for an investigation.

    Bookmark: http://www.rayservers.com/blog/Lord James of Blackheath for updates

    Update 21:22 GMT:

    Unofficial Transcript of the speech by Lord James of Blackheath, in the Lords Chamber of the House of Lords, London, on 16 February 2012

    I’m going to start with my conclusions, but I’m not going to sit down when I’ve made them. Because I’m then going to give you the evidence to support them and hopefully present to you the reasons why I want support for an official inquiry into the mischief I want to unfold to you this afternoon.

    My lords, I have been engaged in pursuit of this issue for nearly 2 years now, and I’m no further through to getting to the truth.

    I think there are three possible conclusions that may come from it. I think there may have been a massive piece of money laundering committed by a major government which ought to know better and that it has effectively undermined the integrity of the British bank the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second alternative is that a major American department has an agency that has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which they are seeking to get at least 50 billion Euros as a payoff. And the third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud which has not been carried out but which has been prepared in order to provide a threat to one government or more if they don’t pay them off. So there are three possibilities and this all needs a very urgent review.

    (continued reading at the site)

Leave a Reply